Should I spend £300 on a tripod? - best travellers tripod
http://www.feisoluk.com/Tripods-Travelle ...
It costs a proud 300 pounds. On the other hand, is small and light.
Saturday, January 16, 2010
Best Travellers Tripod Should I Spend £300 On A Tripod?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
14 comments:
If it fits your needs and you can afford it, why not.
What does this really to anyone here anyway.
I would like, and I think everyone should have a tripod.
If you shoot a long exposure time and / or to build houses so often. The macro and telephoto photography, night scenes, motion capture (watefall) and creates a film in which things have to be a carefully controlled environment, and so on and so forth arange. If someone say a road or a tendency to more time at one of the highest average of the absolute, I would, it is necessary to spend.
I think it should be pointed out, a good investment in a tripod will last a lifetime.
If you enjoy photos at home just for fun, not too much money on a tripod. If you would be a professional, spending that amount on a tripod is the norm. From what you say, do not turn professional, so I think that there is no need to spend much money on a tripod. Some tripods are more expensive than the others. You can get a good tripod for under $ 100. Not the best in the world, but it will work. It can happen that three hundred pounds to happen again for a new lens or a flash drive, not on a tripod.
I spent $ 400 on a tripod, but I would not on a tripod.
The apex of the tripod to hold the camera steady - what if the wind blows, but it is a windy day, you work out of luck. The tripod is too weak. So, if you do not live where there is wind, or are planning to travel to wherever the wind blows hard, well, he wants to. Otherwise, use a Manfrotto.
As awareness of the implementation of a heavy tripod to be!
I say no. And the reason that spend way too much money on a tripod. Although useful (ie a maximum extended length, the length folded), you are really for the convenience of paying, they are too small - it makes sense to some degree. One consolation is that with a nice bag of Nice and is a ball.
Depends. I've never heard of this brand, so I would not. I would like on other brands such as Manfrotto, Bogen, Manfrotto, Giotto look if you are willing to spend the money.
In addition, it would be wise to spend 300 on a camera 150, so spend accordingly.
If you are not professional quality tripods are usually much cheaper than £ 200 I have a huge pro camera, tripod fluid head, and it costs about 400 pounds.
What is something
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Carbon-Fiber-Tripo ...
Well, you wonder how it is used? goes on board to go? What do you know? If you are proposing a study, then woudln't.
If you propose to do it again Packaging Hiking oi
I think I find something cheaper Tho,! But the device to make sure you can keep!
its role in the quality, but $ 300 is very convenient, compact and lightweight. I suggest u buy if the quality is good and if it is a brand. Dogg if not, then you will find further Tripod
I am a portrait and wedding photographer.
I used to use a tripod for the ceremony and formal shots, and some landscapes.
I do everything out of hand. My tripod is dusty.
NO!
Check eBay and others!
You can elsewhere much .. for things like shopping! Probably it could be a good year for much cheaper!
Good luck!
What is your camera in comparison with the tripod? :)
Yaaahhh Pass if you have the money.
If the go, what they proposed that the U and emergency laws, and I feel guilty, not money, then before you, but check eBay or go to, even if it is cheaper everything
Post a Comment